The case of Kozarov v Victoria [2022] HCA 12 concerns a claim brought by the appellant, Mr. Kozarov, who sought compensation under the Victorian WorkCover scheme for injuries sustained during his employment with the State of Victoria. Mr. Kozarov, employed as a public transport driver, was involved in a workplace accident that led to severe back and neck injuries.

he case of Hipworth v VWA revolves around the claim of Rosemary Hipworth, who sought leave to bring proceedings against the Victorian WorkCover Authority (VWA) for damages related to pain and suffering, as well as pecuniary loss.

In Fahey v VWA, the plaintiff, Mr. Fahey, sustained a right shoulder injury from a traumatic scapular fracture, which caused ongoing pain, reduced range of motion, and physical limitations. The injury led to significant challenges in both his professional and personal life. While he returned to work full-time, his role was modified to accommodate his restrictions, which included lifting limitations and avoiding tasks that required significant use of his right arm.

Mr. Elisha was employed by Vision Australia Limited (“Vision Australia”) as an adaptive technology consultant. In March 2015, he was involved in allegations of serious misconduct, specifically related to aggressive behaviour. These allegations were in relation to Mr Elisha’s conduct during his stay in a hotel in rural Victoria amidst his work duties (“the incident”).

Mr. Chandler, the plaintiff, suffered a work-related injury to his left knee in October 2018, which led to a fall that exacerbated pre-existing shoulder conditions. He experienced significant ongoing pain in both shoulders, with his left shoulder condition deteriorating over time. Despite extensive treatment, including surgeries, physiotherapy, and pain management strategies, Mr. Chandler's left shoulder pain remained severe, significantly affecting his daily life.