Piedimonte v Transport Accident Commission [2023] VCC 1698
Facts
In the case of Piedimonte v Transport Accident Commission [2023] VCC 1698, Ms. Piedimonte (“the plaintiff”), sought leave to initiate common law proceedings against the Transport Accident Commission (“TAC”)(“the defendant”) for injuries sustained in a transport accident on 1 April 2016. The primary issue was whether her right hip injuries, specifically a labral tear and osteoarthritis, were caused or aggravated by the accident or were the natural progression of a pre-existing condition. Prior to the accident, Ms. Piedimonte had a history of spinal issues and had received osteopathic treatment for spinal realignment. However, she had not reported any hip-related complaints or undergone medical investigations concerning her hips before the incident.
Principles Used
The court applied the principles outlined in Humphries v Poljak [1992] 2 VR 129, which require a claimant to demonstrate that the injury sustained is serious and that it meets the threshold for common law proceedings. The Court also considered the necessity of establishing a causal link between the accident and the injury, distinguishing between new injuries and the aggravation of pre-existing conditions. Additionally, the credibility of medical evidence was examined, the Court does this particularly when there is a dispute regarding the plaintiff's medical history and the nature of the injuries sustained.
Decision
Judge Clayton granted Ms. Piedimonte leave to commence common law proceedings against the TAC for both pain and suffering and pecuniary loss. The court found that, despite her pre-existing spinal issues, the evidence indicated that the hip injuries were not merely the natural progression of an underlying disease but were caused or aggravated by the transport accident. The court accepted Ms. Piedimonte's testimony regarding the nature and location of her hip pain and noted that her pre-accident osteopathic treatments were primarily focused on her spine, not her hips. This led to the conclusion that the hip injuries were distinct from her prior spinal issues and were sufficiently serious to warrant common law proceedings.
Lessons/New Principles
This case demonstrates the importance of thoroughly assessing the causal relationship between a transport accident and subsequent injuries, especially when pre-existing conditions are present. It highlights the necessity for clear and credible medical evidence to establish that an injury is not merely the natural progression of an underlying disease but is directly linked to the accident. Additionally, the case reinforces the principle that the credibility of the plaintiff's testimony and the focus of prior medical treatments are critical factors in determining the causation and seriousness of the injury.
How we can assist…
At Bastion Legal, we help everyday Australians navigate complex legal issues with practical, straightforward advice. Our team is dedicated to resolving disputes, protecting rights, and achieving fair outcomes. Whatever challenge you’re facing, we provide clear guidance, strong representation, and practical solutions tailored to your situation.
If you’re facing a situation like the one discussed above, you do not need to face these issues alone. We’re here to protect your interests and work towards the outcome you deserve.
Contact us today for a free consultation and take the next step with confidence.